All Issue

2016 Vol.18, Issue 1 Preview Page
Case study of volume loss estimation during slurry tbm tunnelling in weathered zone of granite rock

화강풍화대를 통과하는 슬러리 TBM의 체적손실 산정에 대한 사례 연구

Hyunku Park1
,
Ju-Young Oh1
,
Seokbue Chang2*
,
Seungbok Lee2
박 현구1
,
오 주영1
,
장 석부2*
,
이 승복2
1Samsung C&T Corporation, Civil Business Unit, Manager
2Samsung C&T Corporation, Civil Business Unit, General Manager
1삼성물산 건설부문 Civil사업부 과장
2삼성물산 건설부문 Civil사업부 부장
*교신저자. *Corresponding Author. 
31 January 2016. pp. 61-74
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

This paper presents a case study on the ground settlement and volume loss estimation for slurry pressure balanced shield TBM tunnelling in weathered zone of granite rock. Settlement at each stage of shield tunnelling was analyzed and the volume losses and settlement trough factors were estimated from observations. In addition, using the existing volume loss evaluation method in literature, volume losses were estimated considering ground properties and actual driving parameters. Most of ground settlement occurred during passage of shield skin passage and after backfill grouting, and the measured total volume loss and trough curves appeared to coincide with literature. Shield and tail loss obtained from field measurement were found to be around 90% and 60% of the predictions, where tail loss indicated larger deviation than shield loss.

Keywords
Shield TBM
Ground settlement
Volume loss
Field monitoring
Face pressure
Backfill pressure

본 논문에서는 화강풍화대를 통과하는 슬러리 TBM 굴진 중 지표 침하 및 체적손실 산정에 관한 사례 연구를 수행하였다. 터널 천단 침하 계측 결과로부터 TBM 굴진 단계별 침하 발생 경향을 분석하였고, 횡방향 지표 침하 트라프로부터 굴진 중 체적손실 및 트라프 변수를 산정하였다. 또한, 체적손실 산정 모델을 이용하여 지반 특성과 굴진 중 측정된 기계데이터가 반영된 굴진 단계별 체적손실을 산정하였으며, 이를 실제 계측 결과와 비교･분석하였다. 슬러리 TBM의 경우 대부분의 지표침하는 쉴드 본체 통과 및 뒤채움 주입 이후 발생하는 것으로 나타났고 문헌에 보고된 총 체적손실 및 트라프 곡선 형태가 확인되었다. 실제 굴진 중 체적손실은 굴진 단계별로 쉴드손실 예측값의 90%, 테일부 손실 예측값의 60% 수준으로 분석되었고, 쉴드 손실에 비해 테일부 손실의 편차가 큰 것으로 나타났다.

키워드
쉴드TBM
지표 침하
체적손실
현장 계측
막장압
뒤채움압
References
1
1.Bezuijen, A., Bakker, K.J. (2007), “Bentonite and grout flow around a TBM”, Proceedings of WTC 2007, Prague.
2
2.BouBou, R., Emeriault, F., Kastner, R. (2008), “Correlation between TBM parameters and ground surface settlements - Neural network method”, ISSMGE TC28, Hungary.
3
3.Fargnoli, V., Boldini, D., Amorosi, A. (2013), “TBM tunnelling-induced settlements in coarse- grained soils: The case of the new Milan underg-round line 5”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 38, pp. 336-347.
4
4.FHWA. (2009), “Road Tunnel Manual (FHWA- NHI-09-010)”.
5
5.Forth, R.A., Thorley, C.B.B. (1995), “Ground and building settlement due to tunnelling in Hong Kong”, Land Subsidence, No. 234, pp. 149-160.
6
6.Ingles, O.G. (1972), “Soil Stabilization, Butterworths”, Sydney, Australia.
7
7.Jones, B.D. (2010), “Low-volume-loss tunnelling for London ring main extension”, Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 163, pp. 167-185
8
8.Lagerblad, B., Fjallberg, L. Vogt, C. (2010), “Shrinkage and durability of shotcrete”, Procee-dings of shotcrete elements of a system, ED: Bernard, E.S., 2010, Taylor & Francis Group, London, U.K., pp. 173-180.
9
9.Lee, K.M., Rowe, R.K., Lo, K.Y. (1992), “Subsidence owing to tunneling. I. estimating the gap parameter”, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 929-940.
10
10.Land Transport Authority. (2013), “Particular Specification, Thomson Line Contract T212”. Singapore.
11
11.Loganathan N. (2011), “An innovative method for assessing tunnelling-induced risks to adjacent structures”, Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc., New York, United States.
12
12.Mair, R.J., Taylor, R.N. (1997), “Bored tunneling in ther urban environment”, In proceedings of 14th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Hamburg, Germany.
13
13.MTR Corporation Ltd. (2011), “Consultancy Agreement No. C1105 – Shatin to Central Line”, Hong Kong.
14
14.Peck, R.B. (1969), “Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground, State-of-art report”, In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, State-of-the-Art Volume, Mexico City, Mexico, pp. 225-290.
15
15.Schmidt, B. (1969), “Settlements and ground movements associated with tunneling in soil”, PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, United States.
16
16.Suwansawat, S. (2002), “Earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunneling in bangkok: ground response and prediction of surface settlements using artificial neural networks”, Doctoral Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engine-ering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, United States.
17
17.Wongsaroj, J., Borghi, E.X., Soga, K., Mair, R.J., Sugiyama, T., Hagiwara, T., Bowers, K.H. (2013), “Effect of TBM driving parameters on ground surface movements: channel tunnel rail link contract 220”, In Geotechnical Aspects of Under-ground Construction in Soft Ground: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium TC28. Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Vol. 99, pp. 15-17.
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Tunneling and Underground Space Association
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국터널지하공간학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국터널지하공간학회 논문집
  • Volume : 18
  • No :1
  • Pages :61-74
  • Received Date : 2015-12-15
  • Revised Date : 2016-01-04
  • Accepted Date : 2016-01-08
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2016.18.1.061
Journal Informaiton Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association
Online Submission & Review System
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close