All Issue

2022 Vol.24, Issue 2 Preview Page

Research Paper

A study on EPB shield TBM face pressure prediction using machine learning algorithms

머신러닝 기법을 활용한 토압식 쉴드TBM 막장압 예측에 관한 연구

Kibeom Kwon1
Hangseok Choi2
Oh Oh3
Dongku Kim4*
권 기범1
최 항석2
오 주영3
김 동구4*
1Ph.D. Student, School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University
2Professor, School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University
3Manager, ENG Division, Samsung C&T Corporation
4Research Professor, Future and Fusion Lab of Architectural, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea University
1고려대학교 건축사회환경공학부 박사과정
2고려대학교 건축사회환경공학부 교수
3삼성물산 건설부문 ENG실 책임
4고려대학교 미래건설환경융합연구소 연구교수
*Corresponding Author
31 March 2022. pp. 217-230
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

쉴드TBM (Tunnel Boring Machine) 터널 시공에 있어 막장압 관리는 막장면 붕괴, 지반침하 등을 방지하여 막장 안정성을 유지하는 데 중요한 역할을 담당한다. 특히, 챔버 내부의 굴착토로 막장압을 조절하는 토압식 쉴드TBM의 경우, 이수식 쉴드TBM에 비해 막장압의 관리가 어렵다. 본 연구에서는 국내 토압식 쉴드TBM 터널 시공 현장의 지반조건 및 굴진특성 데이터를 분석하여, 토압식 쉴드TBM 터널의 세그먼트 링별 막장압 예측모델을 제시하였다. 예측모델의 입력특성으로 7가지를 선정하였으며, 912개의 학습 데이터 세트(Training data set)와 228개의 시험 데이터 세트(Test data set)를 확보하였다. 최적의 토압식 쉴드TBM 막장압 예측모델 선정을 위하여 KNN (K-Nearest Neighbors), SVM (Support Vector Machine), RF (Random Forest), XGB (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) 모델의 하이퍼파라미터(Hyperparameter)를 최적화하여 예측성능을 비교한 결과, RF 모델이 7.35 kPa의 평균 제곱근 오차(Root Mean Square Error, RMSE)로 가장 우수한 성능을 나타냈다. 추가적으로, RF 모델의 특성 중요도(Feature importance) 분석을 수행한 결과, 입력특성 중 수압의 영향도가 0.38로 가장 높았으며, 전반적으로 지반조건이 굴진특성보다 높은 중요도를 보여주었다.

키워드
쉴드TBM
토압식 쉴드TBM
막장압 예측
머신러닝
랜덤 포레스트

The adequate control of TBM face pressure is of vital importance to maintain face stability by preventing face collapse and surface settlement. An EPB shield TBM excavates the ground by applying face pressure with the excavated soil in the pressure chamber. One of the challenges during the EPB shield TBM operation is the control of face pressure due to difficulty in managing the excavated soil. In this study, the face pressure of an EPB shield TBM was predicted using the geological and operational data acquired from a domestic TBM tunnel site. Four machine learning algorithms: KNN (K-Nearest Neighbors), SVM (Support Vector Machine), RF (Random Forest), and XGB (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) were applied to predict the face pressure. The model comparison results showed that the RF model yielded the lowest RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) value of 7.35 kPa. Therefore, the RF model was selected as the optimal machine learning algorithm. In addition, the feature importance of the RF model was analyzed to evaluate appropriately the influence of each feature on the face pressure. The water pressure indicated the highest influence, and the importance of the geological conditions was higher in general than that of the operation features in the considered site.

Keywords
Shield TBM
Earth pressure balance shield TBM
Face pressure prediction
Machine learning
Random Forest
References
1
Anagnostou, G., Kovari, K. (1996), "Face stability conditions with earth-pressure-balanced shields", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 165-173. 10.1016/0886-7798(96)00017-X
2
Benardos, A.G., Kaliampakos, D.C. (2004), "Modelling TBM performance with artificial neural networks", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 597-605. 10.1016/j.tust.2004.02.128
3
Broere, W. (2001), Tunnel face stability and new CPT applications, Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, pp. 5.
4
Broms, B.B., Bennermark, H. (1967), "Stability of clay at vertical opening", Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, Vol. 93, No. 1, pp. 71-94. 10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000946
5
Davis, E.H., Gunn, M.J., Mair, R.J., Seneviratine, H.N. (1980), "The stability of shallow tunnels and underground openings in cohesive material", Geotechnique, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 397-416. 10.1680/geot.1980.30.4.397
6
Gao, B., Wang, R., Lin, C., Guo, X., Liu, B., Zhang, W. (2021), "TBM penetration rate prediction based on the long short-term memory neural network", Underground Space, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 718-731. 10.1016/j.undsp.2020.01.003
7
Gao, X., Shi, M., Song, X., Zhang, C., Zhang, H. (2019), "Recurrent neural networks for real-time prediction of TBM operating parameters", Automation in Construction, Vol. 98, pp. 225-235. 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.013
8
Grima, M.A., Bruines, P.A., Verhoef, P.N.W. (2000), "Modelling tunnel boring machine performance by neuro-fuzzy methods", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 259-269. 10.1016/S0886-7798(00)00055-9
9
Hyun, K.C., Min, S., Choi, H., Park, J., Lee, I.M. (2015), "Risk analysis using fault-tree analysis (FTA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) applicable to shield TBM tunnels", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 49, pp. 121-129. 10.1016/j.tust.2015.04.007
10
Jung, J.H., Kim, B.K., Chung, H., Kim, H.M., Lee, I.M. (2019), "A ground condition prediction ahead of tunnel face utilizing time series analysis of shield TBM data in soil tunnel", Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 227-242.
11
Kim, D., Pham, K., Oh, J.Y., Lee, S.J., Choi, H. (2022), "Classification of surface settlement levels induced by TBM driving in urban areas using random forest with data-driven feature selection", Automation in Construction, Vol. 135. 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104109
12
Kim, T.H., Kwak, N.S., Kim, T.K., Jung, S., Ko, T.Y. (2021), "A TBM data-based ground prediction using deep neural network", Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 13-24. 10.7474/TUS.2013.23.1.013
13
Kirsch, A. (2010), Numerical Investigation of the Face Stability of Shallow Tunnels in Sand, Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, CRC Press, London, pp. 795-800. 10.1201/b10551-143
14
Leca, E., Dormieux, L. (1990), "Upper and lower bound solutions for the face stability of shallow circular tunnels in frictional material", Geotechnique, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 581-606. 10.1680/geot.1990.40.4.581
15
Mollon, G., Dias, D., Soubra, A.H. (2013), "Continuous velocity fields for collapse and blowout of a pressurized tunnel face in purely cohesive soil", International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 37, No. 13, pp. 2061-2083. 10.1002/nag.2121
16
Santos Jr, O.J., Celestino, T.B. (2008), "Artificial neural networks analysis of Sao Paulo subway tunnel settlement data", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 481-491. 10.1016/j.tust.2007.07.002
17
Sharafat, A., Latif, K., Seo, J. (2021), "Risk analysis of TBM tunneling projects based on generic bow-tie risk analysis approach in difficult ground conditions", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 111. 10.1016/j.tust.2021.103860
18
Zhang, C., Liang, M., Song, X., Liu, L., Wang, H., Li, W., Shi, M. (2022), "Generative adversarial network for geological prediction based on TBM operational data", Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 162. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108035
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Tunneling and Underground Space Association
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국터널지하공간학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국터널지하공간학회 논문집
  • Volume : 24
  • No :2
  • Pages :217-230
  • Received Date :2022. 02. 21
  • Revised Date :2022. 03. 17
  • Accepted Date : 2022. 03. 17
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2022.24.2.217
Journal Informaiton Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close